Tuesday, August 11, 2020

Who Cares about Your Kid’s Education?

 A challenge for Alaska Parents:



As a teacher in training in Juneau I worked in a program providing outdoor experiences for young children. Before embarking on a group hike of the local area the kids had to be oriented to safe practices. One of the things we asked, while pointing at our face, was: “Whose face is this?”


They replied: “Your face!”


Then we asked, pointing at their faces: “Whose face is that?”


“My face,” they replied.


“So, who is responsible for my face?” we continued. "And who is responsible for your face? And if you are following somebody in the woods, and a branch hits YOUR face, whose fault is that?”


Alaska public education is now that branch hitting some hapless parents' faces.


Today anybody with an Education from Alaska public schools is at great disadvantage if they want to live anyplace but here. Our specialized economy traditionally imports persons with special training and skills for top paying Alaska jobs; the rest work for the State of Alaska, in a unionized trade, or scratch out a living in the service sector. I have overcome the disadvantage of having an Alaska Public Education mostly with independent endeavor--and bluster.


But since March of this year the China pandemic has altered this dynamic. Ted Stevens International Airport is increasing as a hub for trade while our state and local economies are in free-fall. Parents are looking at the coming school year with trepidation as our unionized teachers join their national brothers and sisters in threatening to cower in place.


Parents may require new babysitters.


Perhaps this is a time to take a hard look at the factory model of Alaska public education and anticipate a better way. As an educator and trained teacher I have studied this. As an Alaskan I have lived it.


One of the arguments I recall my father making for coming to Alaska from New Mexico in the early 1960s was the reportedly high quality of the Anchorage School District (ASD) academic program. New Mexico was then at the bottom of the states for its schools--as it remains today. Alaska has joined New Mexico since then.


According to National Center for Education Statistics (NCES):


In math, 33 percent of Alaska 4th Grade students were proficient, ranking our state at a shameful 46th among the 50 states in 2019. This has not changed since 2003. At the NCES interactive web page comparisons can be made between Alaska and any other state of the nation.1

Parents anticipating a move to Alaska can easily see the comparison. 

Alaska’s standing in Grade 4 Math:

By 8th grade Alaska students’ average proficiency declined to 30 percent; only slightly above the rate of 2017. This has declined slightly since 2003, a time when Alaska was slightly above the national average in this area.

 Alaska’s standing in Grade 8 Math:

Reading scores for Alaska 4th grade students were also among the lowest of the nation in 2019. Overall, 25 percent were proficient in Reading. This is a consistent theme of our Alaska schools.

Alaska’s standing in Grade 4 Reading:


And it doesn’t get any better.

By 8th grade Alaska reading proficiency on average declined to 23 percent average in 2019. It is not statistically significant from the rate in 2003.

Alaska’s standing in Grade 8 Reading:


Smart parents considering a move to Alaska may not see our public education as being worthy of their children. Once my dad brought his wife and three kids here he had to supplement our education when we moved to rural Alaska. That hasn’t changed even in the face of an oil bonanza.


This is the reality: We have an education model based on more than 50 independent school districts, each with its own School Board, Superintendent, and administrative structure soaking up State money designated by our Alaska Legislature in backwater Juneau like a sponge. The majority of teachers are actively recruited from Outside. To add insult to injury, in January of 2019 the University of Alaska Anchorage School of Education programs lost accreditation.2


Our system is more about wealth distribution than about education. Every local school board is like a little bird in a nest with its mouth open.


The Pandemic Opportunity


I was in Juneau when public education “charter schools” were legalized in a bill introduced in 1995 by Sen. Bettye Davis. As an employee of NEA-Alaska I was surprised that such a tried and true friend of the teacher union would introduce such legislation diverting school children from traditional programs to parent-directed learning. I know now that this legislation turned out to be a pre-emptive move to assure that all Charter Schools in the state have the same union teachers on their Alaska Adventure as have been delivering poor results for decades.3


Today there are all manner of Charter schools and home school support programs sponsored by school districts for parents who have lost faith in our education factories. Some must be drawn by lottery and parents provide transportation for their kids. Such a deal.


A closer look at our dismal education profile


In 2018, as staff for Rep. Lora Reinbold, I correlated the salaries paid for superintendents in all of Alaska’s school districts with the performance of students as measured by the PEAKS test. I gathered information from the Association of Alaska School Boards (AASB), where I had worked during the mid-1980s as a database technician in Juneau. Back then I helped set up the statewide information gathering system used to support contract negotiations when Alaska still cared about keeping education costs down. AASB gave up that goal long ago except to keep track of the numbers for advocacy purposes, and today school boards are just another special interest group that converges on the legislature every year insisting on more education funds  to pay mostly expendable teachers despite declining enrollments and ever declining academic outcomes.


They have no shame.


Every district is monitored by the Alaska Department of Education annual testing program. Substantial amounts are directed to each district by the legislature. The state budget passes only once the education budget has been approved by NEA-Alaska and associated groups aligned with various special interests. Here is the published chart of academic outcomes compared to economic commitment in terms of district superintendent salaries and benefits:

To consider alternatives to our broken education system at this time we must understand it as we might a money pit home we cannot afford anymore. Parents must decide the future of this system and direct elected officials and education bureaucrats to deliver academic results.


Notice that the data in these spreadsheets is organized by region. Southeast Alaska has some 17 districts fed directly from $Juneau$. Southcentral Alaska has the bulk of students in only 5 districts. Interior includes the Fairbanks North Star Borough. Southwest, and Northwest districts are in the unincorporated borough. These regions represent natural education areas, and could perhaps be aligned with Native Corporations established under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, for efficiencies of scale and regional autonomy.


This is a scam. Proficiency rates are notoriously low and The Alaska Department of Education, the Alaska Legislature and every Alaska school district knows the status of our state’s public education outcomes, yet they continue to whistle past the graveyard.


During the same 30th legislative session when I created the above chart of district performance, Commissioner Michael Johnson presented the Alaska Department of Education version of reality. 

From the report4: 

No reference to academic proficiency. Responsibility for “educational excellence” is with the tribal and community rather than to the State of Alaska or the many professionals engaged in delivery of public education. The entire system is a fountain of happytalk. We who have been through this system have accepted the steady and precipitous decline to this time in history despite untold opportunity for decision makers to address inadequate public education in Alaska.


It is time to take action!


The obligation and responsibility to train children has been termed The Intergenerational Transfer Of Cognitive Skills and is today a cornerstone of Adult Basic Education (ABE) of adults who did not finish traditional high school. The ABE system began in 1941 when young men returning from serving in the military during war needed skills to be employable in the economy.


In 2014 the entire GED was upgraded to nationally normed 12th grade competency. I helped many people get their GED over nine years. In Alaska it is administered through the Department of Labor, not the Department of Education.

To learn more:

 In that teaching job I became familiar with Intergenerational transfer of Cognitive Skills through the work of former Harvard Professor, Tom Sticht, PHd who began his career by supplementing traditional public education to make recruits adequate for military service.


As a researcher, Dr. Sticht contributed to the knowledge of early childhood education, and conducted the first conference on Intergenerational Transfer of Cognitive Skills. Many articles were published by him on the role of oral language and the transfer of literacy.4


New expectations of education


The China Pandemic has impacted public education by instituting fear of face-to-face contact for vulnerable people who are dis-proportionally impacted by the illness. Political leaders have determined what emergency measures are necessary given medical realities. In March the schools were closed and on-line options substituted for classroom interactions between teachers, aides and students.


Ultimately parents are in charge of directing their children’s learning. They must find a way to do this while also attempting to participate in the economy to support their families.


In his academic writings Dr. Sticht presents the background for a previous time when the United States was faced with a need to educate people who had been denied meaningful education:


In the Antebellum period, the education of African American slaves was generally forbidden by various state laws. For instance, acts passed by the General Assembly of North Carolina in 1830 made it a crime punishable by thirty-nine lashes to teach "slaves to read and write, the use of figures excepted" (Jacobs, 1861/1987, p. 270). Nonetheless, many adult slaves were taught to read and write by abolitionist whites or other slaves. Some learned from their masters or by overhearing tutors working with their masters' children or by other surreptitious means (Woodson, 1919/1968).4


With conclusion of the Civil War the United States had to find a way to educate people who had expressly been denied education. The schools were inadequate for the job and many former slaves attended night classes at local schoolhouses to learn what they needed to know to be citizens.


Smart parents must now find ways to educate the next generation of Alaskans despite union educrats with only tin cups and bluster.




1 National Center for Education Statistics


2UAA School of Education programs lose accreditation, Anchorage Daily News, 011519, Michelle Theriault Boots

3Initial Charter School Legislation (1995)


4Report to the Alaska State Legislature 2018

5National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy (NCSALL)

From Wikipedia:


Dr. Thomas Sticht was awarded UNESCO'S Mahatma Gandhi Medal for his twenty-five years of service and dedication.[1]


Sticht created Functional Context Training for the U.S. Military.[2] His biggest contribution has been his research on improving the literacy skills for the new recruits of the United States Army, Navy, and Air Force.


Functional Context education is defined as instructional strategy that integrates the teaching of literacy skills and job content to move learners more successfully and quickly toward their education and employment goals.[3][4] He later developed a training program to elevate literary skills in adult learners. Functional context training stresses on building upon prior knowledge to construct new concepts to accomplish difficult tasks. Sticht proposed that instructors should formulate better learning environments that incorporate real world situations to increase students' performance.


Sticht contributed to the field of Functional Context theory where he proposed that it was vital to make learning relevant to learners. The model of Cognitive system consisted of three components:


1.     Knowledge based (prior knowledge of the learner)

2.     Processing skills (problem solving, language skills, and learning strategies)

3.     Information displays that present information.[2]


The Functional Context approach recommends new assessment methods such as measuring functional learning and academic learning.



1"The Intergenerational Effects of Adult Education". Literacy Coalition of Onondaga County. August 13, 2012. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 3, 2015.

2 Functional Context Training

3Wider Opportunities for Women, 2009.

4Functional Context education


Saturday, August 1, 2020

Decentralize Anchorage. It Really Is Our Only Solution

What does "Government By the People" mean?

By Mike Tavoliero

The era of big government is over. But we cannot go back to the time when our citizens were left to fend for themselves. Instead, we must go forward as one America, one nation working together to meet the challenges we face together. Self-reliance and teamwork are not opposing virtues; we must have both. President William Jefferson Clinton, January 23, 1996 State of the Union Address. 

In reading these sentences I’m captured by their irony and contradiction. Almost a quarter of a century later, do you see as I do these virtues of self-reliance and teamwork replaced by the failings of entitlement and division?

Right now, one look at our current local political circus can provide an answer to this question. 

Our Alaska Constitution established all political power is inherent in the people not the ever increasing size of the political state and the immeasurable costs to our citizens. 

Eaglexit seeks to renew these virtues by establishing the Alaska constitutional vision of local government decentralization. 

Our 1955 Alaska Constitutional Convention stated that “states have the constitutional responsibility for the future development of local government. This responsibility has two important aspects. One is to create local units of government that are efficient units for providing governmental services. The second is to maintain a system of local government that achieves the traditional American goal of extensive citizen participation in the affairs of government.” 

 What does that mean? 

As one of our local assembly members pointed out, our communities would be a better sister city to Anchorage than being under dominion to it. 

Local government decentralization is a long phrase which means a large local government cut into more bite size manageable pieces for its community members. 

It doesn’t mean higher taxes, more regulations, incompetent education systems, ineffective and non-responsive representation, and petty bureaucracies. It also doesn’t mean more costly, and intrusive local government. 

Too often, the apprehension of far-reaching implications of decentralization focus on ideas which may be irrelevant to the outcome. 

The Eaglexit outcome is the traditional American goal of extensive citizen participation in the affairs of government” or more commonly known as “Liberty”. 

Local government decentralization is our state’s and our nation’s last defense against postmodern neo-Marxism and its excesses in social justice and identity politics. This is actively depriving our progeny, our children, our future, of the single benefit of our traditional American goal, individual lifestyle. 

When public policy in jurisdictions of hundred of thousands, if not millions, of citizens are regulated through the actions of a small collective hegemony, local policy makers, a city or county or borough assembly, which is controlled by politically non-regulated public sector unions, education and healthcare organizations, the results are obvious, ambient and ubiquitously anti-American.

Control and power are centralized, and prosperity and wealth are redistributed. 

The question is do you want to return to the traditional American goal? 

Or are you constantly finding yourself insulted because of your beliefs, ridiculed for your actions in support of your beliefs, then as an effort to take action, organize and community activate for a single issue effort only to be denied or patronized by these policy makers and other authorities? 

Even worse, if push comes to shove and you end up in court having spent tens of thousands of dollars only to find your issue lost to judicial activism. This is new case law. The consequence of this effectively makes your issue illegal as a matter of law. 

We’ve seen it time and time again in Alaska. Some of us are at the point where we’ve hit our heads so repetitiously against the wall, we’ve stopped because the pain has been too much. 

The problem with the “Golden Rule” is they, who have the gold, rule. As long as these institutions have control over public policy, public money and public property, our efforts to fight effectively will be scoffed and defeated. 

Local government decentralization is an exercise in timing, method, and opportunity. Local government decentralization aims to give citizens and their elected representatives more power in public decision making. 

UAA Professor Forrest Nabors stated in his article in Must Read Alaska, “Our American system rests upon the cornerstone of self-government and the belief that if you give people authority and responsibility, they will do a better job of governing themselves.” 

Professor Nabors rightly observes when given decentralized authority, greater independence and self government, people will do a better job of governing themselves than distant bureaucrats. 

He  continues: “When delegates to our federal and state conventions drafted their constitutions, they confronted a practical problem. They knew that many communities might not be ready for self-government at that moment. But they foresaw that those communities would grow and mature, and that they ought to be able to cast off outside rule.” 
Assembly District 2 is ready “to cast off outside rule” and incorporate its own self-government. 

 Eaglexit will: 

 • Provide improved local involvement and control of land-use. 

 • Maintain and operate a smaller and more accountable school district. 

 • Allow for a locally controlled public safety sector. 

 • Protect community tax base through a smaller taxing district and greater local community involvement in tax decisions. 

 • Limit government to local constituency enabling home-grown representation of the people and creating collaboration between citizens and elected officials. 

• Mitigate over-zoning, excessive fees, high density housing, parking, traffic, and unnecessary services. 

 • Simplify the permitting process. 

 • Produce an effective and responsive small municipal government. 

 Visit our website at Support and donate.

We have Options

Election Reform Bait-And-Switch (2021 © Many Alaskans appear to be in denial that our modern elections could be circ...